Journal of Business Ethics 10 (10):787 - 795 (1991)
Business ethics is the study of ethics as it applies to a particular sphere of human activity. As such, business ethics presupposes a difference between an individual's experience within a business organization and his or her experience outside the organization. But how do we examine this difference? How do we discuss an individual's experience of everyday reality? What processes create and sustain this reality, and how does one's version of reality affect what is, and what is not, ethical? This paper outlines an approach to these questions based on theory from the sociology of knowledge, an approach which makes some progress towards making business ethics more existential. The sociology of knowledge, and particularly the social constructionist perspective, is concerned with how an institution creates knowledge and how this knowledge affects the cognitive processes of the individuals who make up the institution. The dialectic nature of the interdependent processes which shape both the individual and the organization are important in understanding how business ethics, as one kind of social knowledge, are enacted. Examining these processes leads to several interesting hypotheses about the nature of both the study and practice of business ethics. XXXOnly individuals have a sense of responsibility. — Friedrich Nietzsche.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Zimbardo's “Stanford Prison Experiment” and the Relevance of Social Psychology for Teaching Business Ethics.F. Neil Brady & Jeanne M. Logsdon - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (9):703 - 710.
Democratic Capitalism: Developing a Conscience for the Corporation. [REVIEW]Joseph M. Grcic - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):145 - 150.
Is There “No Such Thing as Business Ethics”?Eric H. Beversluis - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):81 - 88.
Citations of this work BETA
The Role of Ethics in Executive Compensation: Toward a Contractarian Interpretation of the Neoclassical Theory of Managerial Renumeration. [REVIEW]Linda L. Carr & Moosa Valinezhad - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):81 - 93.
Management and the Use of Business Ethics: Towards an Investigative Ethics.Harry Hummels - 1994 - International Journal of Value-Based Management 7 (3):239-253.
Similar books and articles
After Durkheim: An Agenda for the Scoiology of Business Ethics. [REVIEW]John Hendry - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3-4):209 - 218.
Does Business Ethics Make Economic Sense?Amartya Sen - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (1):45-54.
Ethics in Business Education: Working Toward a Meaningful Reciprocity. [REVIEW]W. Michael Hoffman - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (4):259 - 268.
What's the Point of a Business Ethics Course?Ronald F. Duska - 1991 - Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (4):335-354.
Globalization and the Ethics of Business.R. Boatright John - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):1-6.
Islamic Ethics and the Implications for Business.Gillian Rice - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 18 (4):345 - 358.
Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How to Do It Right.Linda Klebe Treviño - 2010 - Wiley.
The Social Function of Business Ethics.Ronald Jeurissen - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (4):821-843.
Business and Society: A Reader in the History, Sociology, and Ethics of Business.Barry Castro (ed.) - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
Collaboration in Business Schools: A Foundation for Community Success. [REVIEW]Leland Horn & Michael Kennedy - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (1):7-15.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #318,183 of 2,178,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?