Computational explanation in neuroscience

Synthese 153 (3):343-353 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to some philosophers, computational explanation is proprietary
to psychology—it does not belong in neuroscience. But neuroscientists routinely offer computational explanations of cognitive phenomena. In fact, computational explanation was initially imported from computability theory into the science of mind by neuroscientists, who justified this move on neurophysiological grounds. Establishing the legitimacy and importance of computational explanation in neuroscience is one thing; shedding light on it is another. I raise some philosophical questions pertaining to computational explanation and outline some promising answers that are being developed by a number of authors.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,311

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The semantic challenge to computational neuroscience.Rick Grush - 2001 - In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 155--172.
Computational explanation and mechanistic explanation of mind.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2007 - In Francesco Ferretti, Massimo Marraffa & Mario De Caro (eds.), Synthese. Springer. pp. 343-353.
Computation without representation.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (2):205-241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
322 (#54,701)

6 months
5 (#237,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?