Quaestio 10:207-218 (2010)

David Piché
Université de Montréal
The following paper shows that prior to Ockham’s doctrine on the intuition of non-existents, two Parisian theologians had already developed, in opposition to Duns Scotus, their own theories on the possibility of having intuitive cognition of non-existent or absent things. The article uses the editions of the two theologians’ Quodlibeta prepared by the author
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.1.102334
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,156
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #471,735 of 2,411,819 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,411,819 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes