Analysis 73 (4):613-626 (2013)

Authors
Hanna Pickard
Johns Hopkins University
Abstract
I clarify some ambiguities in blame-talk and argue that blame's potential for irrationality and propensity to sting vitiates accounts of blame that identify it with consciously accessible, personal-level judgements or beliefs. Drawing on the cognitive psychology of emotion and appraisal theory, I develop an account of blame that accommodates these features. I suggest that blame consists in a range of hostile, negative first-order emotions, towards which the blamer has a specific, accompanying second-order attitude, namely, a feeling of entitlement—a feeling that these hostile, negative first-order emotions are what the blamed object deserves
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/ant075
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.

View all 49 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Responsibility for Implicit Bias.Jules Holroyd - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (3).
The Emotion Account of Blame.Leonhard Menges - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (1):257-273.
Instrumentalism About Moral Responsibility Revisited.Anneli Jefferson - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (276):555-573.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-06

Total views
129 ( #91,919 of 2,520,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #58,730 of 2,520,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes