Syntax in Basic Laws §§29–32

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (2):253-277 (2010)
Abstract
In order to accommodate his view that quantifiers are predicates of predicates within a type theory, Frege introduces a rule which allows a function name to be formed by removing a saturated name from another saturated name which contains it. This rule requires that each name has a rather rich syntactic structure, since one must be able to recognize the occurrences of a name in a larger name. However, I argue that Frege is unable to account for this syntactic structure. I argue that this problem undermines the inductive portion of Frege's proof that all of the names of his system denote in §§29–32 of The Basic Laws
Keywords philosophy of logic   Frege's proof of referentiality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1215/00294527-2010-016
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,803
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2010-08-13

Total downloads
24 ( #218,096 of 2,202,718 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,061 of 2,202,718 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature