Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (1):102-117 (2011)

Authors
Gualtiero Piccinini
University of Missouri, St. Louis
Abstract
I defend three main conclusions. First, whether a method is public is important, because non-public methods are scientifically illegitimate. Second, there are substantive prescriptive differences between the view that private methods are legitimate and the view that private methods are illegitimate. Third, Descriptive Experience Sam-pling is a public method
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2011
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,209
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Neurophenomenology: A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem.F. Varela - 1996 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (4):330-49.
Heterophenomenology Reconsidered.Daniel C. Dennett - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):247-270.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

First-Person Experiments: A Characterisation and Defence.Brentyn Ramm - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9:449–467.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Descriptive Experience Sampling Method.Russell T. Hurlburt & Sarah A. Akhter - 2006 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4):271-301.
Time, Experience, and Descriptive Experience Sampling.John Sutton - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (1):118-129.
Nine Clarifications of Descriptive Experience Sampling.Russell Hurlburt - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (1):274-287.
Descriptive Experience Sampling: What is It Good For?Mark Engelbert & Peter Carruthers - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (1):130-149.
Scientific Change.Hanne Andersen & Brian Hepburn - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Science, Democracy, and Public Policy.Kristin Shrader‐Frechette - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (2-3):255-264.
“Explain” in Scientific Discourse.James A. Overton - 2013 - Synthese 190 (8):1383-1405.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-05-22

Total views
122 ( #88,898 of 2,455,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,137 of 2,455,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes