Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190 (2004)
Traditional mechanistic accounts of language processing derive almost entirely from the study of monologue. Yet, the most natural and basic form of language use is dialogue. As a result, these accounts may only offer limited theories of the mechanisms that underlie language processing in general. We propose a mechanistic account of dialogue, the interactive alignment account, and use it to derive a number of predictions about basic language processes. The account assumes that, in dialogue, the linguistic representations employed by the interlocutors become aligned at many levels, as a result of a largely automatic process. This process greatly simplifies production and comprehension in dialogue. After considering the evidence for the interactive alignment model, we concentrate on three aspects of processing that follow from it. It makes use of a simple interactive inference mechanism, enables the development of local dialogue routines that greatly simplify language processing, and explains the origins of self-monitoring in production. We consider the need for a grammatical framework that is designed to deal with language in dialogue rather than monologue, and discuss a range of implications of the account. Key Words: common ground; dialogue; dialogue routines; language comprehension; language production; monitoring; perception-behavior link.
|Keywords||common ground dialogue dialogue routines language comprehension language production monitoring perception-behavior link|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Participatory Sense-Making.Hanne De Jaegher & Ezequiel Di Paolo - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (4):485-507.
Alignment as a Consequence of Expectation Adaptation: Syntactic Priming is Affected by the Prime's Prediction Error Given Both Prior and Recent Experience.T. Florian Jaeger & Neal E. Snider - 2013 - Cognition 127 (1):57-83.
Naturalizing Joint Action: A Process-Based Approach.Deborah Tollefsen & Rick Dale - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):385-407.
Brain-to-Brain Coupling: A Mechanism for Creating and Sharing a Social World.Uri Hasson, Asif A. Ghazanfar, Bruno Galantucci, Simon Garrod & Christian Keysers - 2012 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (2):114-121.
Behavior Matching in Multimodal Communication is Synchronized.Max M. Louwerse, Rick Dale, Ellen G. Bard & Patrick Jeuniaux - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (8):1404-1426.
Similar books and articles
Resonance Within and Between Linguistic Beings.Stephen D. Goldinger & Tamiko Azuma - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):199-200.
A Common Framework for Language Comprehension and Language Production?Robert J. Hartsuiker & Martin J. Pickering - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):887-888.
A Call for More Dialogue and More Details.J. Cooper Cutting - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):194-194.
Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: Partner-Specific Effects in a Psychology of Dialogue.Susan E. Brennan & Charles A. Metzing - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):192-193.
The Interactive-Alignment Model: Developments and Refinements.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):212-225.
Dialogue Processing: Automatic Alignment or Controlled Understanding?Hadas Shintel & Howard C. Nusbaum - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):210-211.
Is Language Processing Different in Dialogue?Dale J. Barr & Boaz Keysar - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):190-191.
Linguistics Fit for Dialogue.Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):678-678.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads87 ( #60,597 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #17,162 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?