The myth of occurrence-based semantics


Authors
Brian Rabern
University of Edinburgh
Bryan Pickel
University of Glasgow
Abstract
The principle of compositionality requires that the meaning of a complex expression remains the same after substitution of synonymous expressions. Alleged counterexamples to compositionality seem to force a theoretical choice: either apparent synonyms are not synonyms or synonyms do not syntactically occur where they appear to occur. Some theorists have instead looked to Frege’s doctrine of “reference shift” according to which the meaning of an expression is sensitive to its linguistic context. This doctrine is alleged to retain the relevant claims about synonymy and substitution while respecting the compositionality principle. Thus, Salmon (2006) and Glanzberg and King (2020) offer occurrence-based accounts of variable binding, and Pagin and Westerståhl (2010c) argue that an occurrence-based semantics delivers a compositional account of quotation. Our thesis is this: the occurrence-based strategies resolve the apparent failures of substitutivity in the same general way as the standard expression-based semantics do. So it is a myth that a Frege-inspired occurrence-based semantics affords a genuine alternative strategy.
Keywords compositionality  semantic values  linguistic context  reference shift  variable binding  Frege  occurrences  quotation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Relativism and Monadic Truth.Herman Cappelen & John Hawthorne - 2009 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pure Quotation and General Compositionality.Peter Pagin & Dag Westerståhl - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (5):381-415.
Compositionality.Peter Pagin & Dag Westerståhl - 2011 - In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 96-123.
Does Semantic Relationism Solve Frege’s Puzzle?Bryan Pickel & Brian Rabern - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (1):97-118.
Towards a Formal Symbolic Occurrence Logic.Farshad Badie - 2018 - In Hans Götzsche (ed.), The Meaning of Language. Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
Communication and Strong Compositionality.Peter Pagin - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):287-322.
Out of Context.Jerry Fodor & Ernie Lepore - 2004 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 78 (2):77-94.
Twin Pleas: Probing Content and Compositionality.Josefa Toribio - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):871-889.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-04-16

Total views
136 ( #63,358 of 2,310,351 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
136 ( #3,703 of 2,310,351 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature