Abduction and diagrams

Logic Journal of the IGPL (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Abductive conclusions are drawn in a special, co-hortative mood. Abductive conclusions are representative interpretants that represent abduction as a form of reasoning that can convey a general conception of the truth. The truth is not asserted; abduction merely delivers the idea of a matter of course, rendering that idea comparatively simple and natural, hence assuring us of its justified assertibility. Hence abductive reasoning is at home in addressing ‘How Possible’-questions in science. Abductive reasoning concerns the question of how things might, could or would conceivably be such that they can be plausibly asserted. Peirce took all reasoning to be diagrammatic and representable using the graphical method of logic. Yet no examples have previously been found in his large manuscript corpus of what such non-deductive graphs might look like. This paper proposes a new interpretation of a sole exception, a sketch of two graphs from a rejected page from 1903, which might be the only surviving example of Peirce’s abductive graphs. The proposed interpretation takes them to be representative interpretants of this special inverse type of inference.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Diagrams, iconicity, and abductive discovery.Sami Paavola - 2011 - Semiotica 2011 (186):297-314.
Problems with Peirce's concept of abduction.Michael Hoffmann - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (3):271-305.
Advice on Abductive Logic.Dov Gabbay & John Woods - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):189-219.
Four Problems of Abduction: A Brief History.Anya Plutynski - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):227-248.
Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research by Iddo Tavory, Stefan Timmermans.Niiniluoto Ilkka - 2017 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (1):152-154.
Commentary on “The strategic formulation of abductive arguments in everyday reasoning”.John R. Welch - 2016 - Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA).
Abduction is not Deduction-in-Reverse.Marta Cialdea Mayer & Fiora Pirri - 1996 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 4 (1):95-108.
Abductive Reasoning.Douglas Walton - 2004 - Tuscaloosa, AL, USA: University Alabama Press.
Abductive Reasoning: Challenges Ahead.Atocha Aliseda - 2009 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 22 (3):261-270.


Added to PP

16 (#675,590)

6 months
5 (#166,190)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
Hong Kong Baptist University

Citations of this work

Peirce on the justification of abduction.Francesco Bellucci & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 84:12-19.
Modular vs. diagrammatic reasoning.Angelina Bobrova & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2022 - Pragmatics and Cognition 29 (1):111-134.

Add more citations