Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (11):740-743 (2021)

Authors
Joseph Millum
University of St. Andrews
Sophie Gibert
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
Hundreds of millions of rare biospecimens are stored in laboratories and biobanks around the world. Often, the researchers who possess these specimens do not plan to use them, while other researchers limit the scope of their work because they cannot acquire biospecimens that meet their needs. This situation raises an important and underexplored question: how should scientists allocate biospecimens that they do not intend to use? We argue that allocators should aim to maximise the social value of the research enterprise when allocating scarce biospecimens. We provide an ethical framework for assessing the social value of proposed research projects and describe how the framework could be implemented. There are no data in this work.
Keywords Priority-setting  Biospecimens  Allocation  Medical research
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105766
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wanted: Human Biospecimens.Karen J. Maschke - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (5):21-23.
Waving Goodbye to Waivers of Consent.Jeffrey R. Botkin - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (6):inside back cover-inside back co.
Conscience, Courage, and “Consent”.Mark A. Hall & Nancy M. P. King - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (2):30-32.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-03-28

Total views
49 ( #222,486 of 2,462,240 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,417 of 2,462,240 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes