History and Philosophy of Logic 12 (2):195-210 (1991)

Authors
Pieranna Garavaso
University of Minnesota, Morris
Abstract
In both his earlier and later writings, Frege claims that distinct sentences can express the same thought, and that there is a correspondence between the parts of a thought and the parts of the sentence expressing it. The joint assertion of these claims gives rise to a problem: how can there be a correspondence between the parts of one thought and the parts of distinct sentences? This paper discusses Michael Dummett's and Gregory Currie's interpretations of Frege's views on the analysis of thoughts and proposes an alternative interpretation which answers the above problem and provides some insight into Frege's epistemology of thoughts and his theory of human communication
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/014453409108837185
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,261
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Frege: Two Theses, Two Senses.Carlo Penco - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (2):87-109.
Frege, Sense and Limited Rationality.Carlo Penco - 2003 - History of Modern Logic 9:53-65.
Frege on Multiple Analyses and the Essential Articulatedness of Thought.Silver Bronzo - 2017 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 5 (10).
Decomposition and Analysis in Frege’s Grundgesetze.Gregory Landini - 1996 - History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):121-139.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Thoughts Without Parts: Frege’s Doctrine.Andreas Kemmerling - 2011 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 82 (1):165-188.
I. Interpreting Frege: A Reply to Michael Dummett.Gregory Currie - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):345 – 359.
Analysis and Decomposition in Frege and Russell.James Levine - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):195-216.
A Repair of Frege’s Theory of Thoughts.Mark Textor - 2009 - Synthese 167 (1):105 - 123.
Realism Bei Frege: Reply to Burge.Joan Weiner - 1995 - Synthese 102 (3):363 - 382.
Frege's Gedanken Are Not Truth Conditions.Ari Maunu - 2002 - Facta Philosophica 4 (2):231-238.
Decomposition and Analysis in Frege’s Grundgesetze.Gregory Landini - 1996 - History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):121-139.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
39 ( #278,376 of 2,455,883 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #117,600 of 2,455,883 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes