Games as formal tools versus games as explanations in logic and science

Foundations of Science 8 (4):317-364 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper addresses the theoretical notion of a game as it arisesacross scientific inquiries, exploring its uses as a technical andformal asset in logic and science versus an explanatory mechanism. Whilegames comprise a widely used method in a broad intellectual realm(including, but not limited to, philosophy, logic, mathematics,cognitive science, artificial intelligence, computation, linguistics,physics, economics), each discipline advocates its own methodology and aunified understanding is lacking. In the first part of this paper, anumber of game theories in formal studies are critically surveyed. Inthe second part, the doctrine of games as explanations for logic isassessed, and the relevance of a conceptual analysis of games tocognition discussed. It is suggested that the notion of evolution playsa part in the game-theoretic concept of meaning.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

67 (#244,741)

6 months
12 (#222,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
Hong Kong Baptist University

References found in this work

Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.John Von Neumann & Oskar Morgenstern - 1944 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Philosophical grammar.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1974 - Oxford [Eng.]: Blackwell. Edited by Rush Rhees.
Model-Theoretic Logics.Jon Barwise & Solomon Feferman - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
The principles of mathematics revisited.Jaakko Hintikka - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 38 references / Add more references