History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (3):211-228 (2005)
This paper is a discussion of Gödel's arguments for a Platonistic conception of mathematical objects. I review the arguments that Gödel offers in different papers, and compare them to unpublished material (from Gödel's Nachlass). My claim is that Gödel's later arguments simply intend to establish that mathematical knowledge cannot be accounted for by a reflexive analysis of our mental acts. In other words, there is at the basis of mathematics some data whose constitution cannot be explained by introspective analysis. This does not mean that mathematics is independent of the human mind, but only that it is independent of our ?conscious acts and decisions?, to use Gödel's own words. Mathematical objects may then have been created by the human mind, but if so, the process of creation cannot be completely analysed and re-enacted. Such a thesis is weaker than some of the statements that Gödel made about his conceptual realism. However, there is evidence that Gödel seriously considered this weak thesis, or a position depending only on this weak thesis. He also criticized Husserl's Phenomenology from this point of view
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
On the Philosophical Development of Kurt Gödel.Van Atten Mark & Kennedy Juliette - 2003 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (4):425-476.
Between Vienna and Berlin: The Immediate Reception of Godel's Incompleteness Theorems.Paolo Mancosu - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (1):33-45.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
How Do We Know That the Godel Sentence of a Consistent Theory Is True?G. Sereny - 2011 - Philosophia Mathematica 19 (1):47-73.
Kurt Gödel: Essays for His Centennial.Kurt Gödel, Solomon Feferman, Charles Parsons & Stephen G. Simpson (eds.) - 2010 - Association for Symbolic Logic.
Philosophical Consequences of the Gödel Theorem.Alfred Driessen - 2005 - In Eeva Martikainen (ed.), Human Approaches to the Universe. Luther-Agricola-Society.
Future Tasks for Gödel Scholars.John W. Dawson Jr & Cheryl A. Dawson - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (2):150-171.
Wittgenstein as His Own Worst Enemy: The Case of Gödel's Theorem.Mark Steiner - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):257-279.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads57 ( #89,442 of 2,152,222 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #281,219 of 2,152,222 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.