Lettera di Costantino alla Chiesa di Alessandria e Lettera del sinodo di Nicea agli Egiziani (325) i falsi sconosciuti da Atanasio?

Gregorianum 89 (4):727-739 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article proposes the hypothesis that the letters known as direct witnesses to the work of the council of Nicea are indeed false: that is, they are letters written after the episcopate of Athanasius. The political-ecclesial situation of Alexandria in the years 373-378 appears to be that described in the two letters and the only one possible, in my opinion, that corresponds to their tone and content. For this reason, their contents should not be considered a valid source for our knowledge of the themes discussed at the council

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commento alla Lettera del cardinale Ratzinger del 1 agosto 2004.Francesca Rigotti - 2004 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 17 (3):483-490.
Postille alla lettera di Paolo Parrini.Gregorio Piaia - 2000 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references