Sources of Delusion in Analytica Posteriora 1.5

Phronesis 51 (3):252 - 284 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle's philosophically most explicit and sophisticated account of the concept of a (primary-)universal proof is found, not in "Analytica Posteriora" 1.4, where he introduces the notion, but in 1.5. In 1.4 Aristotle merely says that a universal proof must be of something arbitrary as well as of something primary and seems to explain primacy in extensional terms, as concerning the largest possible domain. In 1.5 Aristotle improves upon this account after considering three ways in which we may delude ourselves into thinking we have a primary-universal proof. These three sources of delusion are shown to concern situations in which our arguments do establish the desired conclusion for the largest possible domain, but still fail to be real primary-universal proofs. Presupposing the concept of what may be called an immediate proof, in which something is proved of an arbitrary individual, Aristotle in response now demands that a proof be immediate of the primary thing itself and goes on to sketch a framework in which an intensional criterion for primacy can be formulated. For the most part this article is a comprehensive and detailed commentary on Aristotle's very concise exposition in 1.5. One important result is that the famous passage 74a17-25 referring to two ways of proving the alternation of proportions cannot be used as evidence for the development of pre-Euclidean mathematics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

.[author unknown] - unknown
Substances.S. Marc Cohen - 2009 - In Georgios Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Oxford, UK: Blackwell-Wiley. pp. 197–212.
Proof and canonical proof.Bernhard Weiss - 1997 - Synthese 113 (2):265-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
82 (#187,166)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pieter Hasper
Indiana University, Bloomington

References found in this work

L'argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele.Mario Mignucci - 1977 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 82 (3):423-424.
The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements.Wilbur Richard Knorr - 1975 - Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Add more references