Social Epistemology 18 (2-3):165-179 (2004)
This article examines the belief among the cultural elites that ?people? should be protected from dangerous knowledge, ?dangerous? in the sense that there are factual statements which may have negative moral and political consequences to society. Such a belief in the negative consequences of dangerous ? that is, politically suspicious ? knowledge represents an intellectual tradition that goes back to Plato and his famous state?utopian work Republic. This article analyses moral interpretations of statements regarding matters of fact (so?called moral reading), and draws conclusions about the reasons why knowledge can be considered dangerous to ?the people? or to some specific groups in the population, such as children, mothers, students, the sick and dying and the working class. The so?called sociobiology debate, a controversy that started with the publication of the zoologist E.O. Wilson?s Sociobiology in 1975, is discussed in this article as a ?case study? of dangerous knowledge
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dangerous Knowledge? The Self-Subversion of Social Deviance Theory.Terence Ball - 1980 - Inquiry 23 (4):377 – 395.
Can Cornell Moral Realism Adequately Account for Moral Knowledge?Elizabeth Tropman - 2012 - Theoria 78 (1):26-46.
In Defense of Dangerous Ideas In Every Age, Taboo Questions Raise Our Blood Pressure and Threaten Moral Panic. But We Cannot Be Afraid to Answer Them.Steven Pinker - unknown
The Sociobiology Muddle:On Human Nature. Edward O. Wilson; The Sociobiology Debate. Arthur L. Caplan; Human Sociobiology: A Holistic Approach. Daniel G. Freedman; Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense? Michael Ruse. [REVIEW]Robert L. Simon - 1982 - Ethics 92 (2):327-.
The Public's Right to Know: A Dangerous Notion.Brian Richardson - 2004 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (1):46 – 55.
Brief Remarks on the Evolutionary Method.Robert A. Phillips - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:235-238.
Dangerous Knowledge: On the Epistemic and Moral Significance of Arts in Education.David Carr - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (3):1-15.
Dangerous Supplement/Dangerous Memory.Walter Lowe - 1986 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 61 (1):34-55.
Moral Knowledge, Epistemic Externalism, and Intuitionism.Daniel Star - 2008 - Ratio 21 (3):329-343.
The Cultural Politics of the Sociobiology Debate.Neil Jumonville - 2002 - Journal of the History of Biology 35 (3):569 - 593.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #134,078 of 2,158,671 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,589 of 2,158,671 )
How can I increase my downloads?