Arguing about constitutive and regulative norms

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (2-3):189-217 (2018)

Gabriella Pigozzi
Université Paris Dauphine
Formal arguments are often represented by pairs, but in this paper we consider normative arguments represented by sequences of triples, where constitutive norms derive institutional facts from brute facts, and regulative norms derive deontic facts like obligations and permissions from institutional facts. The institutional facts may be seen as the reasons explaining or warranting the deontic obligations and permissions, and therefore they can be attacked by other normative arguments too. We represent different aspects of normative reasoning by different kinds of consistency checks among these triples, and we use formal argumentation theory to resolve conflicts among such normative arguments. In particular, we introduce various requirements for arguing about norms concerning violations, contrary-to-duty obligations, dilemmas, conflict resolution and different kinds of norms, and we introduce a formal argumentation theory satisfying the requirements. In order to illustrate our framework, we introduce a running example based on university regulations for prospective and actual students.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/11663081.2018.1487242
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,955
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Counterfactuals.D. Lewis - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):403-405.
Input/Output Logics.David Makinson & Leendert van der Torre - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (4):383-408.
Constraints for Input/Output Logics.David Makinson & Leendert van der Torre - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (2):155 - 185.
Input/Output Logics.David Makinson & Leendert Van Der Torre - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (4):383 - 408.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Norms of Competence.Eugenio Bulygin - 1992 - Law and Philosophy 11 (3):201 - 216.
Belief, Normativity and the Constitution of Agency.Emer O'Hagan - 2005 - Philosophical Explorations 8 (1):39-52.
Freedom Without Law.Harrison P. Frye - 2018 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 17 (3):298-316.
Constitutive Rules in Context.Corrado Roversi - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 96 (2):223-238.
The Needs of Understanding: Kant on Empirical Laws and Regulative Ideals.James R. O'Shea - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):216 – 254.
Kant's Antinomy of Teleology: In Defense of a Traditional Interpretation.Nabeel Hamid - forthcoming - In Violetta Waibel & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Kant Congress. Berlin: De Gruyter.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #704,584 of 2,319,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #272,343 of 2,319,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature