Hume on Is and Ought

(ed.)
New York: Palgrave-Macmillan (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This collection of essays showcases recent work on Hume and the Is/Ought question. There are four distinct attempts to redefine and prove Hume's no-ought-from-is thesis in such a way as to evade the famous counterexamples of A.N. Prior. The rival approaches are explained and discussed together with their implications for meta-ethical theory" --Provided by publisher.

Categories

Keywords

Call number

B1499.E8.H838 2010

ISBN(s)

9780230205208

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,213

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Chapters

Kinds of virtue theorist : a response to Christina Swanson.Annette Baier
Hume on Justice.Rosalind Hursthouse
Why internalists about reasons should be Humeans about motivation.Kent Hurtig
Expressivism, motivation internalism, and Hume.Richard Joyce
Is Hume inconsistent? : motivation and morals.Norva Y. S. Lo
Experiences of value.Graham Oddie
Humean sources of normativity.Herlinde Pauer-Studer
If not non-cognitivism, then what?Charles R. Pigden
Introduction to Hume on Motivation and Virtue.Charles Pigden
Against All Reason? Scepticism about the Instrumental Norm.Stephen Finlay
Two kinds of normativity : Korsgaard v. Hume.Luke Russell
Hume and the Debate on 'Motivating Reasons'.Constantine Sandis
The motivation argument for non-cognitivism.Michael Smith
Reply to Baier.Christine Swanton
What kind of virtue theorist is Hume?Christine Swanton

Similar books and articles

Kinds of virtue theorist : a response to Christina Swanson.Annette Baier - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan.
If not non-cognitivism, then what?Charles R. Pigden - 2009 - In Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Hume and the Debate on 'Motivating Reasons'.Constantine Sandis - 2009 - In Charles Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Is Hume inconsistent? : motivation and morals.Norva Y. S. Lo - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 57.
The motivation argument for non-cognitivism.Michael Smith - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 105.
Why internalists about reasons should be Humeans about motivation.Kent Hurtig - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Two kinds of normativity : Korsgaard v. Hume.Luke Russell - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 208.
What kind of virtue theorist is Hume?Christine Swanton - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Hume on Justice.Rosalind Hursthouse - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 264.
Hume on motivation and virtue.Charles Pigden (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-19

Downloads
14 (#770,638)

6 months
4 (#199,940)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Truthmaking and the is—ought gap.Kit Fine - 2018 - Synthese 198 (2):887-914.
Defeasible normative reasoning.Wolfgang Spohn - 2020 - Synthese 197 (4):1391-1428.
The motivation argument and motivational internalism.Daniel Eggers - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2445-2467.
Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references