What, if anything, is an evolutionary novelty?

Philosophy of Science 75 (5):887-898 (2008)
Massimo Pigliucci
CUNY Graduate Center
The idea of phenotypic novelty appears throughout the evolutionary literature. Novelties have been defined so broadly as to make the term meaningless and so narrowly as to apply only to a limited number of spectacular structures. Here I examine some of the available definitions of phenotypic novelty and argue that the modern synthesis is ill equipped at explaining novelties. I then discuss three frameworks that may help biologists get a better insight of how novelties arise during evolution but warn that these frameworks should be considered in addition to, and not as potential substitutes of, the modern synthesis. †To contact the author, please write to: Departments of Ecology and Evolution and Philosophy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794; e‐mail: pigliucci@platofootnote.org.
Keywords evolutionary novelties  phenotypes
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/594532
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Identifying Behavioral Novelty.Rachael L. Brown - 2013 - Biological Theory (2):1-14.
Underdetermination and Evidence in the Developmental Plasticity Debate.Karen Kovaka - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
3,459 ( #190 of 2,303,727 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
158 ( #1,814 of 2,303,727 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature