Pragmatic Aspects of Kantian Theism

The Pluralist 5 (1):279-287 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is there a god? What do we, and what should we, mean by this question? How, if at all, might the question, given that its meaning(s) can be clarified, be settled or even rationally discussed? Is there any chance for a reasonable, scientifically minded person to believe in the reality of God, or is atheism the only intellectually responsible option for us today? Is theism inevitably committed to the pseudoscientific absurdities of creationism, the "intelligent design theory," and other unfortunately increasingly influential fundamentalisms?The purpose of this article is not to solve these issues in the philosophy of religion. Nor will I engage in the science vs. religion controversy in any detail. I do, however ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's criticism of atheism.Lara Denis - 2003 - Kant Studien 94 (2):198-219.
Pascal's wager: pragmatic arguments and belief in God.Jeff Jordan - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Theism, Possible Worlds, and the Multiverse.Klaas J. Kraay - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (3):355 - 368.
Ateism, Agnosticism, and Apothatic Theism.Piotr Sikora - 2010 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):65-80.
Pragmatic and transcendental arguments for theism: A critical examination. [REVIEW]Sami Pihlström - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (3):195-214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-16

Downloads
111 (#151,600)

6 months
1 (#1,241,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sami Pihlström
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references