Communication, reflexivity and harm principle: what might an ideal speech situation look like in responsibility to protect?

Journal of Global Ethics 16 (1):26-44 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTPrevious accounts of International Relations research have extensively focused on deontological ethics in analysing Responsibility to Protect. At the same time, discourse ethics – alo...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The harm principle.Nils Holtug - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
What Is the Harm of Hate Speech?Eric Barendt - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3):539-553.
Responsibilities for Hateful Speech.Evan Simpson - 2006 - Legal Theory 12 (2):157-177.
Is pornography “speech”?Andrew Koppelman - 2008 - Legal Theory 14 (1):71-89.
Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?Caleb Yong - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (4):385-403.
The responsibility for the other and The Responsibility to Protect.Alain Toumayan - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (3):269-288.
Mill's Harm Principle as Social Justice.Huodong Li - 2004 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Is there harm in silence?Joy Lyneham - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (11):642-643.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-12

Downloads
9 (#1,187,161)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations