Armstrong was a Cheat: A Reply to Eric Moore

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy:1-17 (forthcoming)

Jon Pike
Open University (UK)
ABSTRACTIn this paper, we reply to Eric Moore’s argument that Lance Armstrong did not cheat, at least according to one, standard account of cheating. If that is the case, we argue, so much the wors...
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17511321.2018.1561747
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,327
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Responsibility Incorporated.Philip Pettit - 2007 - Ethics 117 (2):171-201.
Social Conventions: From Language to Law.Andrei Marmor - 2009 - Princeton University Press.
The Ethos of Games.Fred D'Agostino - 1981 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 8 (1):7-18.
Collective Responsibility and Collective Obligation.Tracy Isaacs - 2014 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 38 (1):40-57.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Did Armstrong Cheat?Moore Eric - 2017 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 11 (4):413-427.
Reply to Hurlburt.Eric Schwitzgebel & Alan T. Moore - 2018 - Consciousness and Cognition 63:143-145.
"Mirror Images" Are Physical Objects: A Reply to Mr. Armstrong.M. Arthadeva - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):160 – 162.
Reply to Armstrong.John A. Foster - 2004 - Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):27-28.
Reply to Campbell.David M. Armstrong - 1993 - In John Bacon, Keith Campbell & Lloyd Reinhardt (eds.), Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of D M Armstrong. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reply to Jackson's "Block's Challenge".David M. Armstrong - 1993 - In John Bacon, Keith Campbell & Lloyd Reinhardt (eds.), Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of D.M. Armstrong. New York: Cambridge University Press.
A Reply to My Critics.George Edward Moore - 1942 - In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore. Open Court.
An Idealistic Reply To The Later Moore.Robert Allinson - 1980 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 7 (3):375.
A Reply From George Armstrong Kelly.George Armstrong Kelly - 1979 - The Owl of Minerva 10 (4):10-11.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #435,379 of 2,271,479 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #136,497 of 2,271,479 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature