In need of remedy: US policy for compensating injured research participants

Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (3):182-185 (2014)

There is an emerging ethical consensus that injured research participants should receive medical care and compensation for their research-related injuries. This consensus is premised on notions of beneficence, distributive justice, compensatory justice and reciprocity. In response, countries around the world have implemented no-fault compensation systems to ensure that research participants are adequately protected in the event of injury. The United States, the world's leading sponsor of research, has chosen instead to rely on its legal system to provide injured research participants with medical care and compensation. This article argues that US reliance on its legal system leaves injured research participants unprotected in the event of injury. Nearly every injured research participant will have difficulty receiving compensation in court, and certain classes of research participants will be barred from receiving compensation altogether. The United States’ outlier status also threatens to impede US-sponsored multinational research, potentially delaying important biomedical advances. To rectify this injustice, researchers, Institutional Review Boards, sponsors and research institutions should advocate systematic no-fault compensation in the United States to bring US law into accord with global ethical norms and ensure that injured research participants are adequately protected
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2012-100771
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,955
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Research-Related Injury: Problems and Solutions.Larry D. Scott - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (3):419-428.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Unequal Treatment of Human Research Subjects.David B. Resnik - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (1):23-32.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Participants' Responsibilities in Clinical Research.D. B. Resnik & E. Ness - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (12):746-750.
Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Reasoning and the Review of Research Involving Human Subjects.Lisa Eckenwiler - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):37-69.
Empirical Research on Research Ethics.Joan E. Sieber - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):397 – 412.


Added to PP index

Total views
4 ( #933,743 of 2,319,377 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #592,230 of 2,319,377 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature