Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (1):1-13 (1991)
Problems of fuel ethanol production have been the subject of numerous reports, including this analysis. The conclusions are that ethanol: does not improve U.S. energy security; is uneconomical; is not a renewable energy source; and increases environmental degradation. Ethanol production is wasteful of energy resources and does not increase energy security. Considerably more energy, much of it high- grade fossil fuels, is required to produce ethanol than is available in the energy output. About 72% more energy is used to produce a gallon of ethanol than the energy in a gallon of ethanol. Ethanol production from corn is not renewable energy. Its production uses more non- renewable fossil energy resources in growing the corn and in the fermentation/distillation process than is produced as ethanol energy. Ethanol produced from corn and other food crops is also an unreliable and therefore a non-secure source of energy, because of the likelihood of uncontrollable climatic fluctuations, particularly droughts which reduce crop yields. The expected priority for corn and other food crops would be for food and feed. Increasing ethanol production would increase degradation of agricultural land and water and pollute the environment. In U.S. corn production, soil erodes some 18- times faster than soil is reformed, and, where irrigated, corn production mines water faster than recharge of aquifers. Increasing the cost of food and diverting human food resources to the costly and inefficient production of ethanol fuel raise major ethical questions. These occur at a time when more food is needed to meet the basic needs of a rapidly growing world population.
|Keywords||ethanol food energy environment pollution|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sustainable Development: Scientific and Ethical Assessments. [REVIEW]Mario Giampietro & Sandra G. F. Bukkens - 1992 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (1):27-57.
Similar books and articles
Biofuels: Efficiency, Ethics, and Limits to Human Appropriation of Ecosystem Services. [REVIEW]Tiziano Gomiero, Maurizio G. Paoletti & David Pimentel - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (5):403-434.
Including Public Perspectives in Industrial Biotechnology and the Biobased Economy.Lino Paula & Frans Birrer - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (3):253-267.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Solar Energy and Wind-Power Utilization.L. Lakatos, G. Hevessy & J. Kovács - 2011 - World Futures 67 (6):395 - 408.
Overcoming Energy Gluttony: A Philosophical Perspective.William B. Irvine - 2011 - Zygon 46 (4):915-928.
Introduction to “the Energy Transition: Religious and Cultural Perspectives”.Larry L. Rasmussen, Normand M. Laurendeau & Dan Solomon - 2011 - Zygon 46 (4):872-889.
Economic and Social Foundations of Solar Energy.Bruce A. McDaniel - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (2):155-168.
Energy Metabolism and the Evolution of Reproductive Suppression in the Human Female.Grazyna Jasienska - 2003 - Acta Biotheoretica 51 (1):1-18.
'Speed of Light -A Fundamental Retrospection to Prospection'.Narendra Katkar - 2011 - Journal of American Science 7 (5):16.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #131,650 of 2,164,286 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,286 )
How can I increase my downloads?