Philosophy of science and history of science: A troubling interaction [Book Review]

Abstract
History and philosophy complement and overlap each other in subject matter, but the two disciplines exhibit conflict over methodology. Since Hempel's challenge to historians that they should adopt the covering law model of explanation, the methodological conflict has revolved around the respective roles of the general and the particular in each discipline. In recent years, the revival of narrativism in history, coupled with the trend in philosophy of science to rely upon case studies, joins the methodological conflict anew. So long as contemporary philosophy of science relies upon history's methodology to construct its case studies, it subjects itself to a paradoxical situation: the better the history, the worse the philosophy. An example of the methodological conflict is presented in the case of Antoine Lavoisier. This example also serves our ultimateconclusion, which is that distinctively philosophical methods of case-study design promise enhanced prescriptive powers for philosophy of science.
Keywords methodology  philosophy of history  historiography  case-history method  interdisciplinary (philosophy history)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1008353021407
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,861
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later.Jutta Schickore - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (4):453-481.
Using Multiple Means of Determination.Jutta Schickore & Klodian Coko - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):295-313.
Studying Justificatory Practice: An Attempt to Integrate the History and Philosophy of Science.Jutta Schickore - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):85-107.
Explaining Referential Stability of Physics Concepts: The Semantic Embedding Approach. [REVIEW]Andreas Bartels - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (2):267 - 281.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Anachronism and Retrospective Explanation: In Defence of a Present-Centred History of Science.N. Tosh - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):647-659.
Reconstructed Science as Philosophical Evidence.Nancy L. Maull - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:119-129.
Is the Philosophy of Science Scientific?A. Cornelius Benjamin - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (4):351-358.
Philosophy of Science and History3 of Science: A Non Troubling Interaction. [REVIEW]F. Michael Akeroyd - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):159-162.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
50 ( #113,836 of 2,210,666 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #228,327 of 2,210,666 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature