Shall Children Play? Evidence from Arts in Late Imperial China

Diogenes 64 (1-2):77-89 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines various positions on whether children should be allowed to play in late imperial China. Demonstrating distinctly different views from Neo-Confucian thinkers, professional genre painters of “Children at Play” ( yingxi tu 嬰戲圖), and the emerging pediatric specialists, the article maintains that clearly multi-vocal forces coexisted during the Song Dynasty, including a persuasive child-favoring stance that remains unique in global humanities on this issue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy for Children in China:: A Late Preliminary Anti-Report.David Kennedy & Walter Kohan - 2002 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 22 (1):37-49.
How Do Children Represent Pretend Play?Ori Friedman - 2013 - In Marjorie Taylor (ed.), Oxford handbook of the development of imagination. Oxford University Press. pp. 186-195.
Children in the Visual Arts of Imperial Rome (review).Jenifer Neils - 2007 - American Journal of Philology 128 (2):289-292.
Power Shift: Play and Agency in Early Childhood.Megan Lee - 2015 - Childhood and Philosophy 11 (22):241-264.
Children’s generic interpretation of pretense.Carolyn Baer & Ori Friedman - 2016 - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 150:99-111.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-17

Downloads
3 (#1,682,188)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references