So how does the mind work?

Mind and Language 20 (1):1-38 (2005)
Abstract
In my book How the Mind Works, I defended the theory that the human mind is a naturally selected system of organs of computation. Jerry Fodor claims that 'the mind doesn't work that way'(in a book with that title) because (1) Turing Machines cannot duplicate humans' ability to perform abduction (inference to the best explanation); (2) though a massively modular system could succeed at abduction, such a system is implausible on other grounds; and (3) evolution adds nothing to our understanding of the mind. In this review I show that these arguments are flawed. First, my claim that the mind is a computational system is different from the claim Fodor attacks (that the mind has the architecture of a Turing Machine); therefore the practical limitations of Turing Machines are irrelevant. Second, Fodor identifies abduction with the cumulative accomplishments of the scientific community over millennia. This is very different from the accomplishments of human common sense, so the supposed gap between human cognition and computational models may be illusory. Third, my claim about biological specialization, as seen in organ systems, is distinct from Fodor's own notion of encapsulated modules, so the limitations of the latter are irrelevant. Fourth, Fodor's arguments dismissing of the relevance of evolution to psychology are unsound
Keywords Computation  Mind  Science  Turing Machines  Fodor, J
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00274.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,810
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Language Instinct.Steven Pinker - 1995 - Harper Perennial.
The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate.Barrett H. Clark & Kurzban Robert - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (3):628-647.
Cognitive Maps and the Language of Thought.Michael Rescorla - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):377-407.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
185 ( #25,346 of 2,202,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #97,465 of 2,202,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature