The bishops' dilemma with capitalism: A critical analysis [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):445 - 452 (1988)
One of the major criticisms of contemporary capitalist society which the bishops' pastoral letter raises is the increasing economic, political and social marginalization resulting from the concentration of wealth and power in the form of monopoly capital. The bishops condemn these contemporary inequalities as unjust, undemocratic and antithetical to the teachings of the Church and Catholic humanism. Given this criticism, we can better understand the bishops' policy prescriptions as intended to show how monopoly capital can be reconciled with the common good, the problem as explicitly posed in section 281 of their pastoral. Hence, their proposal for economic democracy and economic planning can be seen as one possible solution to this general problem of monopoly concentration and marginalization.However, as I criticize in my paper, the bishops' policy prescriptions are undermined by contradictions in their position as well as questionable assumptions implicit to their model for economic democracy. On the one hand and as motivated by the bishops' desire to promote greater democracy and social justice for marginalized groups, the bishops' propose greater state intervention in the economy, particularly in areas concerning the planning and control over investment decisions. On the other hand and on behalf of the rights and liberties of private property owners, the bishops' want to preserve a measure of laissez-faire and private initiative in the marketplace. In short, the bishops' seem undecided about which of their social sentiments should have priority — their egalitarian or libertarian sentiments. Apparently, and as I demonstrate in my paper, the bishops fear more the imagined threats of social democracy to the status quo of private property than the actual marginalizing effects of private monopoly capital.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00382857
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,349
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
“Political, Not Metaphysical”.James W. Boettcher - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:205-219.
The Bishops' Pastoral: A New Theory of Justice. [REVIEW]Stephen Bickham - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):437 - 443.
The Ideology of Social Justice in Economic Justice for All.William E. Murnion - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (11):847 - 854.
Why is the Bishops' Letter on the U.S. Economy so Unconvincing?William S. Reece - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):553 - 560.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
12 ( #386,462 of 2,193,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #95,976 of 2,193,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature