Thomas Hobbes and the Ethics of Freedom

Inquiry 54 (5):541 - 563 (2011)
Abstract
Abstract Freedom in the sense of free will is a multiway power to do any one of a number of things, leaving it up to us which one of a range of options by way of action we perform. What are the ethical implications of our possession of such a power? The paper examines the pre-Hobbesian scholastic view of writers such as Peter Lombard and Francisco Suárez: freedom as a multiway power is linked to the right to liberty understood as a right to exercise that power, and to liberation as a desirable goal involving the perfection of that power. Freedom as a power, liberty as a right, and liberation as a desirable goal, are all linked within this scholastic view to a distinctive theory of law as constituting, in its primary form of natural law, the normative recognition of human freedom. Hobbes's denial of the very existence of freedom as a power led him to a radical revision both of the theory of law and of the relation of law to liberty. Law and liberty were no longer harmonious phenomena, but were left in essential conflict. One legacy of Hobbes is the attempt to base a theory of law and liberty not on freedom as a multiway power, but on rationality. Instead of an ethics of freedom, we have an ethics of reason as involving autonomy. The paper expresses some scepticism about the prospects for such an appeal to reason as a replacement for multiway freedom
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2011.608886
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1700 - Oxford University Press.
Utilitarianism.Mill John Stuart - 1863 - Cleveland: World Pub. Co..
Punishment and Responsibility.H. L. A. Hart - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (172):162-162.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Power, Scepticism and Ethical Theory.Thomas Pink - 2015 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 76:225-251.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Liberty and Leviathan.Philip Pettit - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (1):131-151.
Thomas Reid on Freedom and Morality.William L. Rowe - 1991 - Cornell University Press.
Power and Moral Responsibility.Thomas Pink - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (2):127 – 149.
The Problem of Freedom.Mary T. Clark (ed.) - 1973 - New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Freedom as Motion.Leslie D. Feldman - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:229-243.
What Freedom Is.Wells Earl Draughon - 2003 - Writer's Showcase.
Thomas Reid on Active Power and Free Agency.Xiangdong Xu - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):369-389.
Freedom, Liberty, and Property.Jonathan Wolff - 1997 - Critical Review 11 (3):345-357.
Overcoming Metaphysics: Elias and Foucault on Power and Freedom.Ian Burkitt - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):50-72.
Liberty, Autonomy, and Kant's Civil Society.Chris W. Surprenant - 2010 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (1).

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-09-09

Total downloads

60 ( #85,063 of 2,153,858 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #119,783 of 2,153,858 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums