The past and future of the past tense

Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (11):456-463 (2002)

Abstract
What is the interaction between storage and computation in language processing? What is the psychological status of grammatical rules? What are the relative strengths of connectionist and symbolic models of cognition? How are the components of language implemented in the brain? The English past tense has served as an arena for debates on these issues. We defend the theory that irregular past-tense forms are stored in the lexicon, a division of declarative memory, whereas regular forms can be computed by a concatenation rule, which requires the procedural system. Irregulars have the psychological, linguistic and neuropsychological signatures of lexical memory, whereas regulars often have the signatures of grammatical processing. Furthermore, because regular inflection is rule-driven, speakers can apply it whenever memory fails
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,883
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 50 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-03

Total views
42 ( #199,664 of 2,266,264 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #439,992 of 2,266,264 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature