American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (4):373 - 381 (1986)
I want to examine critically a certain strategy of moral justification which I shall call instrumentalism. By this I mean the view that a moral theory is rationally justified if the actions, life-plan, or set of social arrangements it prescribes can be shown to be the best means to the achievement of an agent's final ends, whatever these may be. Instrumentalism presupposes a commitment to what I shall call the Humean conception of the self. By this I mean a certain way of conceiving the motivational and structural constituents of the self. Briefly, the self on this conception is motivated by its desires for states of affairs that are temporally or spatiotemporally external to the self. And it is structured by the normative requirements of instrumental rationality: The self is conceived as rationally coherent to the extent that theoretical reason calculates and schedules the satisfaction of as many of its desires as possible, with the minimum necessary costs. The motivational and structural elements of the Humean conception of the self combine to form a familiar explanatory model of human agency: We make sense of an agent's behavior by ascribing to her the desire to achieve the ends that she does in fact achieve, and the theoretically rational belief that, given the information and resources available to her, behaving as she did was the most efficient way to do so. I shall want to argue that to the extent that instrumentalism is successful in providing an objective justification of a moral theory - and I shall contend that it cannot be completely successful - it cannot provide a moral justification. But when we attempt to modify it so as to produce a specifically moral justification, we see that either it is impossible to do this, or else the Humean notion of instrumental rationality is doing no justificatory work.
|Keywords||Instrumentalism Moral justification Objectivity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Years of Moral Epistemology: A Bibliography.Laura Donohue & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (S1):217-229.
Similar books and articles
From Aperspectival Objectivity to Strong Objectivity: The Quest for Moral Objectivity.Jennifer Tannoch-Bland - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (1):155 - 178.
Instrumentalism Revisited.Elliott Sober - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001 (91):3 - 39.
Social Attachments as Conditions for the Condition of the Good Life? A Critique of Will Kymlicka's Moral Monism.Bart van Leeuwen - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):401-428.
After Objectivity: An Empirical Study of Moral Judgment.Shaun Nichols - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):3 – 26.
The Relevance of Trust for Moral Justification.Theresa Weynand Tobin - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (4):599-628.
Intractable Conflicts and Moral Objectivity: A Dialogical, Problem-Based Approach.William Rehg - 1999 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):229 – 257.
Objectivity and Dialectical Methods in Ethics.David O. Brink - 1999 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):195 – 212.
Kant on the Objectivity of the Moral Law (1994).Adrian M. S. Piper - 1997 - In Andrews Reath, Barbara Herman & Christine Korsgaard (eds.), Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads31 ( #167,434 of 2,177,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #22,139 of 2,177,979 )
How can I increase my downloads?