Justiça e Reconhecimento: uma interpretação das bases sociais do autorrespeito de John Rawls a partir do debate redistribuição e reconhecimento

Dissertation, Federal University of Santa Catarina (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The thesis aims to provide an interpretation of John Rawls’ social bases of self-respect from the debate on redistribution and recognition in the current state of the art of theories of justice. The first chapter reenacts the reception of Rawlsian theory in the debate based on three critiques: (a) Iris Young's critique of the allocative-distributive paradigm, (b) Axel Honneth’s critique of the legal-political limitation, (c) Nancy Fraser's critique of the redistributive-reductionism. Far from considering the conception of ‘justice as fairness’ as an insensitive terrain for dealing with matters of recognition, criticisms point out, on the contrary, the attempts of liberal Rawlsian theory to move into these issues, mainly taking the social bases of self-respect into account. However, these criticisms agree that Rawls' theory of justice would fail for several reasons. In the following chapters, each of these criticisms is addressed. The second chapter replies to Young's criticism. Contrary to what the author have supposed, ‘justice as fairness’ is better understood as a relational conception of justice rather than an allocative-distributive one. The third chapter addresses Honneth's criticism. On the one hand, the Critical Theorist is right in stating the limitations of Rawls' theory of justice; however, on the other hand, a deontological theory of justice – like the Rawlsian one – conceives these limitations as a normative advantage rather than as a theoretical flaw. The fourth chapter focuses on Fraser's critique. Likewise in her deontological model, it is argued that ‘justice as fairness’ would also have taken the cultural dimension of justice duly into account as well as, more specifically, status inequalities and cultural conflicts. Given the compatibility between their normative models, in the fifth and last chapter, a return to Fraser's deontological recognition via Rawls is advocated.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justiça, liberdades básicas e as bases sociais do autorrespeito.Denilson Werle - 2014 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 13 (1):74-90.
Fenomenologia do Direito em Alexandre Kojève.Agemir Bavaresco & Sérgio B. Christino - 2006 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 51 (4):5-28.
Axel Honneth e a sua teoria plural da justiça.Paulo Vitorino Fontes - 2019 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 64 (2):e32882.
Nancy Fraser: Uma Teórica da Justiça Reticente (À Teoria Rawlsiana).Diana Piroli (ed.) - 2021 - Porto Alegre: Editora Fundação Fênix.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-02

Downloads
52 (#314,382)

6 months
52 (#89,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Diana Piroli
University of Catania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references