Historical and Epistemological Reflections on the Culture of Machines around the Renaissance: How Science and Technique Work?

Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 2 (2):20-42 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is divided into two parts, this being the first one. The second is entitled ‘Historical and Epistemological Reflections on the Culture of Machines around Renaissance: Machines, Machineries and Perpetual Motion’ and will be published in Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum in 2015. Based on our recent studies, we provide here a historical and epistemological feature on the role played by machines and machineries. Ours is an epistemological thesis based on a series of historical examples to show that the relations between theoretical science and the construction of machines cannot be taken for granted, a priori. Our analysis is mainly based on the culture of machines around 15th and 17th centuries, namely the epoch of Late Renaissance and Early Modern Age. For this is the period of scientific revolution and this age offers abundant interesting material for researches into the relations of theoretical science/construction of machines as well. However, to prove our epistemological thesis, we will also exploit examples of machines built in other historical periods. Particularly, a discussion concerning the relationship between science theory and the development of science art crafts produced by non-recognized scientists in a certain historical time is presented. The main questions are: when and why did the tension between science give rise to a new scientific approach to applied discipline such as studies on machines and machineries? What kind of science was used for projecting machines and machineries? Was science at the time a necessary precondition to build a machine? In the first part we will focus on the difference between Aristotelian-Euclidean and Archimedean approaches and we will outline the heritage of these two different approaches in late medieval and Renaissance science. In the second part, we will apply our reconstructions to some historical and epistemological problems concerning the relations of science/technology/constructions of machines. The problem of perpetual motion will play an important role in this context.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Art: Brought to You by Creative Machines.Steffen Steinert - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (3):267-284.
On thinking machines and feeling machines.Roland Puccetti - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (May):39-51.
The broad conception of computation.Jack Copeland - 1997 - American Behavioral Scientist 40 (6):690-716.
Thinking And Machines.H. R. T. Roberts - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (126):356-356.
Culture and Machines in Renaissance Europe.Pamela Long - 2009 - Early Science and Medicine 14 (4):549-554.
An Immanent Machine: Reconsidering grades, historical and present.Charles Tocci - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (7):762-778.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-25

Downloads
36 (#431,270)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?