Reading of “De Rerum Natura” in the Light of Modern Physics

Open Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):268-271 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An analysis of the Lucretius atomism is given, that makes particular reference to the naturalistic arguments and contents of the poem. A possible comparison with the atomism of nowadays, based on quite new, both theoretical and experimental grounds, must be treated with much care. But it seems possible and interesting to compare at least the world outlined by Lucretius, with the new world, derived by familiarity with modern theories of matter. This is the point I have tried to stress

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animadversiones philosophiae de natura rerum et mundo.M. J. Harning - 2005 - Los Angeles, Calif.: Striking Impressions. Edited by R. J. Koppany.
Do the causal principles of modern physics contradict causal anti-fundamentalism?John D. Norton - 2007 - In Peter Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Thinking about Causes: From Greek Philosophy to Modern Physics.
Lucretius de Rerum Natura 5.849–854.C. W. Chilton - 1980 - Classical Quarterly 30 (02):378-.
Lucretius De Rerum Natura V. [REVIEW]G. B. Townend - 1985 - The Classical Review 35 (02):273-.
De rerum natura.Charles Alva Lane - 1895 - The Monist 5 (2):1 - 17.
The Original Plan of Lucretius' De Rerum Natura.G. B. Townend - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (01):101-.
Mens and emotion: De rerum natura 3.136–46.Kirk R. Sanders - 2008 - Classical Quarterly 58 (1):362-366.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-29

Downloads
17 (#846,424)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Introduction.Quentin Smith - 2008 - In Epistemology: new essays. New York : Oxford University Press,: Oxford University Press.
Φιλολογοσ.E. J. Kenney - 1966 - The Classical Review 16 (02):212-.

Add more references