David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 21 (39) (2010)
The paper argues that something is art only if (i) it belongs to a special kind of internal history and (ii) needs to be understood and appreciated in the light of such history. This goes against both the traditional view that art has a timeless, ahistorical essence and the historicist view that there can be no ahistorical perspective for understanding art. The paper draws on Hegel’s view that art needs to be understood through its history, but rejects the idea that the history of art has an end in the double sense of a goal and an end point. It also rejects Arthur Danto’s Hegel-inspired claim that the ahistorical essence of art is revealed at the end of its history and opens the door to a natural alliance between philosophers of art and art historians
|Keywords||History of art, Hegel, philosophy of art|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ingrid Scheibler (1999). Effective History and the End of Art: From Nietzsche to Danto. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (6):1-28.
Noël Carroll (2011). History and the Philosophy of Art. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):370-382.
Robert Nelson (2007). The Spirit of Secular Art: A History of the Sacramental Roots of Contemporary Artistic Values. Monash University Epress.
Jonathan Gilmore (1995). David Carrier's Art History. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1):39-47.
David Carrier (1998). Introduction: Danto and His Critics: After the End of Art and Art History. History and Theory 37 (4):1–16.
Robert Pippin (2007). What Was Abstract Art? (From the Point of View of Hegel). In Stephen Houlgate (ed.), Hegel and the Arts. Northwestern University Press. pp. 1-24.
Martin R. Seel (1998). Art as Appearance: Two Comments on Arthur C. Danto's After the End of Art. History and Theory 37 (4):102–114.
Andrew Jones (2008). Art and Archaeology (R.) Osborne and (J.) Tanner Eds. Art's Agency and Art History (New Interventions in Art History). Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007. £50, 9781405135375 (Hbk); £24.99, 9781405135382 (Pbk). [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 128:263-.
Todd Parker (2012). An Introduction to Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (1):122-123.
Cristian Hainic (2011). A Few Uses of Phenomenology Within Art History. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (1):70-78.
Theodore D. George (2003). Specifications: Hegel, Heidegger, and the Comedy of the End of Art. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):27-41.
Added to index2011-03-09
Total downloads28 ( #171,715 of 1,925,557 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,152 of 1,925,557 )
How can I increase my downloads?