Synthese 183 (S1):33-58 (2011)

Authors
Paul Piwek
Open University (UK)
Abstract
This paper aims to develop the implications of logical expressivism for a theory of dialogue coherence. I proceed in three steps. Firstly, certain structural properties of cooperative dialogue are identified. Secondly, I describe a variant of the multi-agent natural deduction calculus that I introduced in Piwek (J Logic Lang Inf 16(4):403–421, 2007 ) and demonstrate how it accounts for the aforementioned structures. Thirdly, I examine how the aforementioned system can be used to formalise an expressivist account of logical vocabulary that is inspired by Brandom (Making it explicit: reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment, 1994 ; Articulating reasons: an introduction to inferentialism, 2000 ). This account conceives of the logical vocabulary as a tool which allows speakers to describe the inferential practices which underlie their language use, i.e., it allows them to make those practices explicit. The rewards of this exercise are twofold: (1) We obtain a more precise account of logical expressivism which can be defended more effectively against the critique that such accounts lead to cultural relativism. (2) The formalised distinction between engaging in a practice and expressing it, opens the way for a revision of the theory of dialogue coherence. This revision eliminates the need for logically complex formulae to account for certain structural properties of cooperative dialogue
Keywords natural deduction  dialogue  inference  logical expressivism  agent communication
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-011-0015-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,133
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Experience and Nature.John Dewey & Paul Carus Foundation - 1925 - Open Court Publishing Company.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Meaning and Dialogue Coherence: A Proof-Theoretic Investigation.Paul Piwek - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):403-421.
Logic for Morals, Morals From Logic.Charlie Kurth - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (2):161-180.
What is a Logical Diagram?Catherine Legg - 2013 - In Sun-Joo Shin & Amirouche Moktefi (eds.), Visual Reasoning with Diagrams. Springer. pp. 1-18.
Expressivism Concerning Epistemic Modals.Benjamin Schnieder - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):601-615.
Expressivism for Two Voices.Huw Price - 2011 - In Pragmatism, Science and Naturalism. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. pp. 87-113.
Habits-Expressivism About Epistemic Justification.Christos Kyriacou - 2012 - Philosophical Papers 41 (2):209 - 237.
Epistemic Expressivism.Matthew Chrisman - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (2):118-126.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-10-11

Total views
142 ( #74,511 of 2,448,164 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #304,927 of 2,448,164 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes