Chateaubriand on the ambiguity of counter-factual suppositions

Manuscrito 27 (1):55-64 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Logical Forms Chateaubriand introduces a disambiguation technique that might turn out to be highly useful for analyzing important classes of sentences. In particular, he claims that this technique is relevant for analyzing counterfactual suppositions. In this paper I critically examine this claim and conclude that the ambiguity of counterfactuals is contextual rather than structural

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The pleasures of suppositions.Elizabeth Picciuto - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (4):487 – 503.
A generalization of Specker's theorem on typical ambiguity.Richard Kaye - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):458-466.
Truth and proof.Otávio Bueno - 2008 - Manuscrito 31 (1):419-440.
Counterfactuals for free.Richard Creath - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 57 (1):95 - 101.
Nonreductive Ethical Naturalism.Andrew B. Schoedinger - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:3-6.
Counterfactuals: The epistemic analysis.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2005 - Philosophia Scientiae 9 (1):83-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-12

Downloads
9 (#1,228,347)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Claudio Pizzi
Università degli Studi di Siena

Citations of this work

Goodman and Parry on Counterfactual.Oswaldo Chateaubriand - 2011 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 15 (3):383–397.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references