Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):558-559 (2005)

Abstract
Sunstein's review of research on moral heuristics is rich and informative – even without his central claim that individuals often commit moral errors. We question the value of positing such a normative moral framework for the study of moral judgment. We also propose an alternative standard for evaluating moral judgments – that of subjective rationality.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x05390091
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,360
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What Good is Moral Reasoning?Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Mind and Society 10 (2):131-148.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Beyond Moral Judgment.Alice Crary - 2007 - Harvard University Press.
In Defense of Israel Scheffler's Conception of Moral Education.R. Jerrold Coombs - 1997 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (1/2):175-187.
Morality, Normativity, and Society.David Copp - 1995 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Testimony and its Authority.Philip Nickel - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):253-266.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
73 ( #146,817 of 2,448,796 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #300,727 of 2,448,796 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes