Do normative standards advance our understanding of moral judgment?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):558-559 (2005)
Abstract
Sunstein's review of research on moral heuristics is rich and informative – even without his central claim that individuals often commit moral errors. We question the value of positing such a normative moral framework for the study of moral judgment. We also propose an alternative standard for evaluating moral judgments – that of subjective rationality.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X05390091
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What Good is Moral Reasoning?Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Mind and Society 10 (2):131-148.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Beyond Moral Judgment.Alice Crary - 2007 - Harvard University Press.
Moral Testimony and its Authority.Philip Nickel - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):253-266.
Morality, Normativity, and Society.David Copp - 1995 - Oxford University Press.
In Defense of Israel Scheffler's Conception of Moral Education.R. Jerrold Coombs - 1997 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (1/2):175-187.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
63 ( #86,390 of 2,197,331 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,047 of 2,197,331 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature