Blasphemy, dogmatism and injustice: The rough edges of on certainty [Book Review]

Abstract
On Certainty remains one the mostprovocative and challenging parts ofWittgenstein's intellectual legacy.Philosophers generally read this text as anassault on the traditional sceptic/anti-scepticdebate. But some commentators identifypolitical – specifically `conservative' –sentiments at work here. Others embraceWittgenstein's (alleged) `pluralism', whilethose less enthused think the latter collapsesinto relativism. Although this mixed receptionis, I will argue, partly due to Wittgenstein'sown troubled engagement with the central themesof On Certainty, the real difficultyand value of this text lies in itsintertwining questions of epistemology,religious belief and ethical-politicaljudgement.
Keywords Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1025739719165
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,658
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Religion, Relativism, and Wittgenstein's Naturalism.Bob Plant - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (2):177 - 209.
The Confessing Animal in Foucault and Wittgenstein.Bob Plant - 2006 - Journal of Religious Ethics 34 (4):533-559.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

28 ( #182,916 of 2,169,706 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,460 of 2,169,706 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums