Evolution, Neutrality, and Antecedent Probability: a Reply to Van Till and McMullin

Christian Scholar's Review 21 (1):80-109 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

First, I'd like to thank Professors Van Till, Pun, and McMullin for their careful and thoughtful replies. There is a deep level of agreement among all four of us; as is customary with replies and replies to replies, however, I shall concentrate on our areas of disagreement. In the cases of Van Till and McMullin, this may give an impression of deeper disagreement than actually exists. In the case of Pun it leaves me with little to say except Yea and Amen; I find no serious disagreement between us.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
108 (#167,603)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alvin Plantinga
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Methodological Naturalism Under Attack.Michael Ruse - 2005 - South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):44-60.
Evolution and special creation.Ernan Mc Mullin - 1993 - Zygon 28 (3):299-335.
Booknotes.R. M. - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (3):353-358.
Booknotes.R. M. - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (4):403-406.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references