Authors
Bob Plant
University of Aberdeen (PhD)
Abstract
Abstract Wittgenstein?s remarks on religious and magical practices are often thought to harbour troubling fideistic and relativistic views. Unsurprisingly, commentators are generally resistant to the idea that religious belief constitutes a ?language?game? governed by its own peculiar ?rules?, and is thereby insulated from the critical assessment of non?participants. Indeed, on this fideist?relativist reading, it is unclear how mutual understanding between believers and non?believers (even between different sorts of believers) would be possible. In this paper I do three things: (i) show why the fideist?relativist reading of Wittgenstein is not wildly implausible (Sections 1?2); (ii) argue that, despite its initial plausibility, this reading fails to take into account Wittgenstein?s naturalism (Sections 3?4); and (iii) explain what sort of naturalism this is, and how it sheds light on Wittgenstein?s remarks on religious belief (Sections 5?6)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09672559.2011.561615
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,715
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Zettel.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1967 - Blackwell.

View all 67 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Wittgenstein, Religious “Passion,” and Fundamentalism.Bob Plant - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (2):280-309.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and Relativism.Paul O'Grady - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):315-337.
Wittgenstein and Religion.Michael Kober - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):87-116.
Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?Annalisa Coliva - 2010 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (1):1-23.
“A Quite Different System of Payment”.Andrew J. Peach - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:249-275.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-06-16

Total views
62 ( #156,559 of 2,386,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,015 of 2,386,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes