Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (1):66 – 75 (1982)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The author replies to Michael Tooley's comments ('Alvin Plantinga and the argument from evil', Australasian journal of philosophy, December 1980) on his treatment of the argument from evil in The nature of necessity; he argues that Toole's remarks constitute at best a mere galimatias
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1080/00048408212340491 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Humean Objection to Plantinga’s Quantitative Free Will Defense.Anders Kraal - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):221-233.
Similar books and articles
Knowledge of God * by Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley.T. J. Mawson - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):591-592.
Can Robots Think : Reply to Tooley's Second Statement.Alvin Plantinga - 2008 - In Knowledge of God. Blackwell.
Public Institutions for Cooperative Action: A Reply to James Tooley.Stewart Ranson - 1995 - British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1):35-42.
The Nature of Evil a Reply to Garrard.Christopher Hamilton - 1999 - Philosophical Explorations 2 (2):122 – 138.
Plantinga and the Problem of Evil.Heimir Geirsson - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:109-113.
Alvin Plantinga and the Argument From Evil.Michael Tooley - 1980 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (4):360 – 376.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
66 ( #151,257 of 2,411,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #539,061 of 2,411,744 )
2009-01-28
Total views
66 ( #151,257 of 2,411,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #539,061 of 2,411,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads