The Rise Of Cartesian Occasionalism


This study offers a new account of the development of Cartesian Occasionalism. The doctrine of Occasionalism - most famously advocated by Nicolas Malebranche - states that God alone is the cause of every event, and created substances are merely "occasional causes." In the years following René Descartes' death in 1650, several of his followers -- including Arnold Geulincx, Gerauld de Cordemoy and Louis de la Forge - argued for some version of this thesis. My study builds on recent scholarship about these first Cartesian Occasionalists, the motives that led them and Malebranche to adopt Occasionalism, and the connections between Occasionalism and the views of Descartes. I analyze the doctrine of Occasionalism, and examine its relationship to Descartes' philosophy. I argue that Descartes' views in physics and metaphysics are consistent with the claim that corporeal substances have intrinsic causal powers, and reply to arguments by Gary Hatfield, Janet Broughton and Daniel Garber that purport to show otherwise. I examine how Occasionalism relates to several proposed problems with Descartes' claim that the human mind causally interacts with the human body, and argue that Occasionalism is not the "natural" solution to these problems. I conclude by canvassing the arguments of the earliest Cartesian Occasionalists. I argue Cartesian Occasionalism was neither an ad hoc solution to the mindbody problem, nor a logical consequence of Descartes' own views, but rather an attempt to extend and better systematize Cartesian philosophy.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,292

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

François lamy, occasionalism, and the mind-body problem.Fred Ablondi - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 619-629.
Occasionalism: causation among the Cartesians.Steven Nadler - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Causality and Human Freedom in Malebranche.Fred Ablondi - 1996 - Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):321-331.
Divine Activity and Motive Power in Descartes's Physics.Andrew R. Platt - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):623 - 646.
Malebranche’s Occasionalism.Alan Baker - 2005 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):251-272.
Régis's scholastic mechanism.Walter Ott - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):2-14.
Descartes and Malebranche on thought, sensation and the nature of the mind.Antonia LoLordo - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.
Cartesian causation: Continuous, instantaneous, overdetermined.Geoffrey Gorham - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):389-423.
God, causation and occasionalism.William F. Vallicella - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (1):3-18.
Occasionalism and non-reductive physicalism: another look at the continuous creation argument.Daniel Lim - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (1):39-57.
Cordemoy and occasionalism.Steven M. Nadler - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (1):37-54.
Causal powers and occasionalism from Descartes to Malebranche.Desmond Clarke - 2000 - In John Schuster, Stephen Gaukroger & John Sutton (eds.), Descartes' Natural Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 131--48.
Malebranche.Andrew Pyle - 2003 - Routledge.
Occasionalism and general will in Malebranche.Steven M. Nadler - 1993 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 31 (1):31-47.


Added to PP

36 (#351,304)

6 months
1 (#510,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references