Philosophical Topics 38 (1):159-180 (2010)
Slavery seems to us to be a paradigm of a morally wrong institutionalized practice. And yet for most of its millennia-long historical existence it was typically accepted as a natural, necessary, and inevitable feature of the social world. This widespread normative consensus was only challenged toward the end of the eighteenth century. Then, within a hundred years of the emergence of radical moral criticism of slavery, the existing practices had been dismantled and the institution itself “abolished.” How do we explain such a “profound transformation in moral perception” (Davis 1975)? It may seem obvious that the moral agency and character of the leaders and activists of the abolition movement, their supporters, and their governmental representatives were the primary motors of change.That is to say, the various actors involved came to see, recognize, or acknowledge the true (morally evil) nature of slavery and were thereby motivated to act against it. This “commonsense,” “moral explanation” is endorsed by most of the philosophers who have reflected on the morality of slavery. But despite the intuitiveness of thinking that it was the moral agency of the actors, pitted against the evil and injustice of slavery, that brought about the latter’s downfall, I will endeavor to show that such thinking is inadequate both to the facts and to the explanatory desiderata. I contend that it was not ignor ance of the supposedly inherent moral status of slavery that maintained people’s complicity with it, but practical barriers to them conceiving it dispensable
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy General Interest Philosophy of Mind|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Ethics of Animal Research: A Survey of Pediatric Health Care Workers.Ari R. Joffe, Meredith Bara, Natalie Anton & Nathan Nobis - 2014 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 9 (1):20.
Similar books and articles
When is the Time of Slavery? The History and Politics of Slavery in Contemporary Legal Argument.Ariela J. Gross - manuscript
Moral Explanations.Neil Sinclair - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Blackwell.
Hutcheson and the "Classical" Theory of Slavery.Wylie Sypher - 1939 - Journal of Negro History 24 (3):263-280.
Jefferson, Morality, and the Problem of Slavery.Ari Helo & Peter Onuf - 2003 - The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series 60 (3):583-614.
Slavery, Philosophy, and American Literature, 1830-1860.Maurice S. Lee - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
Moral Value, Response-Dependence, and Rigid Designation.Brad Thompson - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):71-94.
“From the Prison of Slavery to the Slavery of Prison”: Angela Y. Davis’s Abolition Democracy.Brady Thomas Heiner - 2007 - Radical Philosophy Today 5:219-227.
How to Prove That Some Acts Are Wrong (Without Using Substantive Moral Premises).Christian Coons - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (1):83–98.
“From the Prison of Slavery to the Slavery of Prison”.Brady Thomas Heiner - 2007 - Radical Philosophy Today 2007:219-227.
Kant on Radical Evil and the Origin of Moral Responsibility.Irene McMullin - 2013 - Kantian Review 18 (1):49-72.
Slavery in Global Context.Jane Duran - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):61-69.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads18 ( #270,497 of 2,169,155 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,290 of 2,169,155 )
How can I increase my downloads?