Journal of Mind and Behavior 29 (1-2) (2008)
| Abstract |
One of the oldest and most fundamental distinctions and disputes of classical epistemology is that between the rationalists and empiricists. In recent decades, partly due to the increasing influence of evolutionary thought in psychology, the argument has become central in cognitive science as well, but it will remain empirically intractable until further advances occur in neurogenetics, neuroscience, and how these tie in to fundamental psychological mechanisms and processes
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 61,064
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Galen's Critique of Rationalist and Empiricist Anatomy.Christopher E. Cosans - 1997 - Journal of the History of Biology 30 (1):35 - 54.
Epistemological and Theoretical Foundations of Constructivist Cognitive Therapies: Post-Rationalist Developments.Juan Balbi - 2008 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 1 (1):15-27.
In Defense of Rationalist Science.Anya Plutynski - 2011 - In William Krieger (ed.), Science at the Frontiers: Perspectives on the History and Philosophy of Science.
Yes, It Does: A Diatribe on Jerry Fodor's the Mind Doesn't Work That Way.Susan Schneider - 2007 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness.
Tracing the Biological Roots of Knowledge.G. Nagarjuna - 2006 - In N. S. Rangaswamy (ed.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Centre for Studies in Civilizations.
Indian Cognitivism and the Phenomenology of Conceptualization.Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (2):277-296.
The "Digital Divide" Is Not a Problem in Need of Rectifying.Walter Block - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):393 - 406.
Reduction, Elimination, and the Mental.Schwartz Justin - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (June):203-20.
Tracing the Biological Roots of Knowledge.Nagarjuna G. - 2009 - In Rangaswamy N. S. (ed.), Life and Organicism. Centre for Studies in Civilizations.
Why is 'Incommensurability' a Problem?Nancy J. Nersessian - 1982 - Acta Biotheoretica 31 (4):205-218.
Rethinking the Divide: Modules and Central Systems.Michael K. Cundall - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):379-393.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-12-29
Total views
26 ( #412,556 of 2,439,611 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #432,499 of 2,439,611 )
2013-12-29
Total views
26 ( #412,556 of 2,439,611 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #432,499 of 2,439,611 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
