In Paula Olmos (ed.), Narration as Argument. Cham: Springer. pp. 63-81 (2017)

Authors
Gilbert Edward Plumer
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (PhD)
Abstract
Rodden writes, “How do stories persuade us? How do they ‘move’—and move us? The short answer: by analogies.” Rodden’s claim is a natural first view, also held by others. This chapter considers the extent to which this view is true and helpful in understanding how fictional narratives, taken as wholes, may be argumentative, comparing it to the two principal (though not necessarily exclusive) alternatives that have been proposed: understanding fictional narratives as exhibiting the structure of suppositional argument, or the structure of a kind of transcendental argument. Three key aspects of understanding a fictional narrative as an argument from analogy are identified. First, the argument will be relativistic or depend in an essential way upon the circumstances or intentions of the auditor or author. Second, in view of the first aspect, the argument will be loose and subjective, and accordingly less likely to yield knowledge. Third, the argument will not exhibit a distinctive structure applicable only to fictional narratives. I find that the third, and sometimes the first and second, of these same three aspects apply to understanding fictional narratives as suppositional arguments. I present considerations that point to a way of establishing that some extended fictions exhibit the structure of a kind of transcendental argument that is neither relativistic nor subjective, is knowledge-generating, and is uniquely applicable to fictional narratives. This supports literary cognitivism—the thesis that “literary fiction can be a source of knowledge in a way that depends crucially on its being fictional.”
Keywords analogy  analogical argument  suppositional reasoning  thought experiment  transcendental argument  believability  cognitive value of literature  Trudy Govier  Douglas Walton  literary cognitivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Transcendental Argument of the Novel.Gilbert Plumer - 2017 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (2):148-167.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Novels as Arguments.Gilbert Plumer - 2015 - Informal Logic 35 (4):488-507.
Similarity, Precedent and Argument From Analogy.Douglas Walton - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (3):217-246.
Story Similarity in Arguments From Analogy.Douglas Walton - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):190-221.
Eluding Wilson’s “Elusive Narrators”.David Davies - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (3):387 - 394.
Argument From Analogy in Legal Rhetoric.Douglas Walton - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (3):279-302.
Trudy Govier and Premise Adequacy.Derek Allen - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (2):116-142.
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-29

Total views
35 ( #324,969 of 2,505,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,142 of 2,505,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes