In William Krieger (ed.), Science at the Frontiers: Perspectives on the History and Philosophy of Science (2011)
Mainstream philosophy of science has embraced an “empiricist” approach to scientific method. To be slightly more precise, I venture that most philosophers of science today would endorse the view that experience is the source of most scientific knowledge. The aim of this essay will be to challenge the consensus, by showing how we cannot and should not abandon all elements of the “rationalist” tradition, a tradition often identified with philosophers such as Descartes. There are several elements frequently identified with “rationalist” science (Stump, 2005): questioning of sense experience, the attempt to rethink the “metaphysical” foundations of one’s science, using either thought experiment, or appealing to demonstrative arguments purporting to establish ‘necessary’ truths, often using either mathematics or geometry, and appeal to “virtues” not usually considered “strictly empirical,” such as simplicity. This essay explores the effective deployment of such considerations in the history and current practice of science.
|Keywords||rationalism empiricism scientific method|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Critical Rationalism in the Test Tube?Nikos Psarros - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):297 - 305.
Critical Rationalism in the Test Tube? Lecture Given at the ''International Summer School on the Philosophy of Chemistry and Biochemistry'', Bradford & Ilkley Community College, 11. – 14. July 1994. [REVIEW]Nikos Psarros - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):297-305.
Galen's Critique of Rationalist and Empiricist Anatomy.E. Cosans Christopher - 1997 - Journal of the History of Biology 30 (1):35 - 54.
Rationality and the Tu Quoque Argument.Joseph Agassi - 1973 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):395 – 406.
What’s Wrong With Aim-Oriented Empiricism?Nicholas Maxwell - 2015 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 3 (2):5-31.
"Empiricism All the Way Down": A Defense of the Value-Neutrality of Science in Response to Helen Longino's Contextual Empiricism.Stéphanie Ruphy - 2006 - Perspectives on Science 14 (2):189-214.
The Experimental Foundations of Galen's Teleology.Christopher E. Cosans - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (1):63-80.
Popper's Critical Rationalism: A Philosophical Investigation.Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2010 - Routledge.
Do We Need a Scientific Revolution?Nicholas Maxwell - 2008 - Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.
Induction and Scientific Realism: Einstein Versus Van Fraassen Part One: How to Solve the Problem of Induction.Nicholas Maxwell - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1):61-79.
Added to index2011-08-13
Total downloads52 ( #100,603 of 2,170,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,514 of 2,170,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?