Cognition 61 (3):299-308 (1996)

Comments on G. Marcus' criticisms (see record 1996-24670-001) of K. Plunkett's and V. Marcham's (see record 1994-35650-001) connectionist account of the acquisition of the English past tense (verb morphology). The original model is reviewed. Graphing, overregularization, and other criticisms are addressed (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2000 APA, all rights reserved).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00721-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,110
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Theories of Early Language Acquisition.Kim Plunkett - 1997 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (4):146-153.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Past and Future of the Past Tense.Steven Pinker & Michael Ullman - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (11):456-463.
The Past and Future of the Past Tense Debate.Steven Pinker & Michael T. Ullman - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (11):456-463.
The Past-Tense Debate.S. Pinker & M. T. Ullman - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (11):456-463.
Memory, Expression, and Past-Tense Self-Knowledge.William Child - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):54–76.


Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #282,893 of 2,448,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #304,927 of 2,448,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes