Learning from a connectionist model of the acquisition of the English past tense

Cognition 61 (3):299-308 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Comments on G. Marcus' criticisms (see record 1996-24670-001) of K. Plunkett's and V. Marcham's (see record 1994-35650-001) connectionist account of the acquisition of the English past tense (verb morphology). The original model is reviewed. Graphing, overregularization, and other criticisms are addressed (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2000 APA, all rights reserved).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,466

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Past and Future of the Past Tense.Steven Pinker & Michael Ullman - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (11):456-463.
The Past and Future of the Past Tense Debate.Steven Pinker & Michael T. Ullman - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (11):456-463.
The Past-Tense Debate.S. Pinker & M. T. Ullman - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (11):456-463.
Memory, Expression, and Past-Tense Self-Knowledge.William Child - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):54–76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
38 (#304,639)

6 months
1 (#417,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?