On the Relevance of Marginal Humans: A Reply to Sapontzis

Between the Species 4 (2):5 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animals, handicapped children and the tragedy of marginal cases.J. L. Nelson - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (4):191-193.
The Argument from Marginal Cases: is species a relevant difference.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):225-235.
Marginal Humans, The Argument From Kinds, And The Similarity Argument.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 5 (1):47-63.
Experimentation on humans and nonhumans.Evelyn B. Pluhar - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):333-355.
Response to Sapontzis.D. D. Todd - 1977 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (June):566-568.
Moral Rights and Human Culture.Lisa Bortolotti - 2006 - Ethical Perspectives 13 (4):603-620.
Rely to Professor Allen.George Bowles - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-04

Downloads
24 (#642,030)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Marginal Humans, The Argument From Kinds, And The Similarity Argument.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 5 (1):47-63.

Add more citations