Argumentation 15 (2):173-189 (2001)
The nontechnical ability to identify or match argumentative structure seems to be an important reasoning skill. Instruments that have questions designed to measure this skill include major standardized tests for graduate school admission, for example, the United States-Canadian Law School Admission Test (LSAT), the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE), and the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT). Writers and reviewers of such tests need an appropriate foundation for developing such questions--they need a proper representation of phenomenological argumentative structure--for legitimacy, and because these tests affect people's lives. This paper attempts to construct an adequate and appropriate representation of such structure, that is, the logical structure that an argument is perceived to have by mature reasoners, albeit ones who are untrained in logic.
|Keywords||argument structure fallacy logical form logical constants pattern of reasoning standardized tests material validity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Semiotic Phenomenology and the 'Dialectical Approach'to Intercultural Communication: Paradigm Crisis and the Actualities of Research Practice.Jacqueline M. Martinez - 2008 - Semiotica 2008 (169):135-153.
Similar books and articles
What Constitutes a Formal Analogy?Kenneth Olson & Gilbert Plumer - 2002 - In Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Argumentation and its Applications [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-8.
Logical Argument Structures in Decision-Making.Jane Macoubrie - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (3):291-313.
Worldwide Testing and Test Security Issues: Ethical Challenges and Solutions.David F. Foster - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (3):207-228.
On the Concept of Material Consequence.Tomis Kapitan - 1982 - History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (2):193-211.
Argument-Explanation Complementarity and the Structure of Informal Reasoning.G. Randolph Mayes - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (1):92-111.
A Little Roundup of Modus Tollens in the Flesh.David Socher - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (1):111.
Argumentative Text as Rhetorical Structure: An Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory. [REVIEW]M. Azar - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):97-114.
The Structure of the Skeptical Argument.Anthony Brueckner - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):827-835.
The Logical Structure of Functional Explanations in Biology.Mary B. Williams - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:37 - 46.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads421 ( #5,502 of 2,169,095 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #12,118 of 2,169,095 )
How can I increase my downloads?