Argumentation 15 (2):173-189 (2001)

Authors
Gilbert Edward Plumer
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (PhD)
Abstract
The nontechnical ability to identify or match argumentative structure seems to be an important reasoning skill. Instruments that have questions designed to measure this skill include major standardized tests for graduate school admission, for example, the United States-Canadian Law School Admission Test (LSAT), the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE), and the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT). Writers and reviewers of such tests need an appropriate foundation for developing such questions--they need a proper representation of phenomenological argumentative structure--for legitimacy, and because these tests affect people's lives. This paper attempts to construct an adequate and appropriate representation of such structure, that is, the logical structure that an argument is perceived to have by mature reasoners, albeit ones who are untrained in logic.
Keywords argument structure  fallacy  logical form  logical constants  pattern of reasoning  standardized tests  material validity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1011180401186
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1978 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Value of Genetic Fallacies.Andrew C. Ward - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (1):1-33.
Can Cogency Vanish?Gilbert Plumer - 2016 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 8 (1):89-109.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Constitutes a Formal Analogy?Kenneth Olson & Gilbert Plumer - 2002 - In Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Argumentation and its Applications [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-8.
The Logic of Tests of Significance.Stephen Spielman - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (3):211-226.
On the Concept of Material Consequence.Tomis Kapitan - 1982 - History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (2):193-211.
Logic for the LSAT.Nancy Slonneger Hancock - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):125-155.
Necessary Assumptions.Gilbert Plumer - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (1):41-61.
A Little Roundup of Modus Tollens in the Flesh.David Socher - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (1):111.
The Structure of the Skeptical Argument.Anthony Brueckner - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):827-835.
The Logical Structure of Functional Explanations in Biology.Mary B. Williams - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:37 - 46.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-11

Total views
641 ( #7,561 of 2,340,252 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #19,665 of 2,340,252 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes